Opinion
No. 05-73743.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed December 14, 2009.
Eric W. Schultz, Esq., Eric W. Schultz, Esq., Buffalo, NY, for Petitioner.
James Eugene Grimes, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ — U.S. Department of Jus
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration Court. Agency Nos. A073-419-361, A072-475-044.
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Billa Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an immigration judge's ("IJ") exclusion order. We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
We lack jurisdiction over Singh's contentions that the IJ's November 29, 1994, exclusion order is not valid because Singh failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Puga v. Chertoff, 488 F.3d 812, 815 (9th Cir. 2007).
To the extent Singh is challenging the government's decision to execute the exclusion order, we lack jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g).
In light of our disposition, Singh's motion to supplement the record is moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.