Opinion
No. 18-70694
05-30-2019
DAVINDER SINGH, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Agency No. A070-642-168 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Davinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA's discretionary decision not to reopen proceedings sua sponte, where Singh's contentions do not amount to colorable constitutional claims or questions of law. See Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) (jurisdiction to review BIA decisions denying sua sponte reopening is limited to reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or constitutional error); see also Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005) ("To be colorable in this context, . . . the claim must have some possible validity." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (BIA is only required to "announce its decision in terms sufficient to enable" review).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.