Opinion
Case No. 2:14-cv-00630-JAD-CWH
09-11-2014
ORDER
Petitioner has paid the filing fee. The court has reviewed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and the court will refer this action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit because the petition is successive.
Petitioner challenges the validity of the judgment of conviction in State v. Singer, Case No. 87C080849, in the Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada. Petitioner was convicted of first-degree murder with the use of a deadly weapon. Petitioner challenged the same judgment of conviction in Singer v. Neven, Case No. 2:08-cv-00373-KJD-GWF. The court dismissed that action because it was untimely pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Petitioner appealed that dismissal. Both this court and the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability.
"[D]ismissal of a section 2254 habeas petition for failure to comply with the statute of limitations renders subsequent petitions second or successive for purposes of . . . 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)." McNabb v. Yates, 576 F.3d 1028, 1030 (9th Cir. 2009). Petitioner must first obtain authorization from the court of appeals before this court can consider his petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of the court file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall add Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically serve respondents with a copy of the petition and a copy of this order. No response by respondents is necessary.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Circuit Rule 22-3(a), the clerk of the court shall refer this action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall administratively close this action.
DATED: September 11, 2014.
/s/_________
JENNIFER A. DORSEY
United States District Judge