Singer v. Krul

Full title: Daniel SINGER, Appellant, v. Casey KRUL, Respondent.

Court: Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Mar 29, 2012

967 N.E.2d 699 (N.Y. 2012)

18 N.Y.3d 953

944 N.Y.S.2d 474

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 68604

Opinion

2012-03-29

Daniel SINGER, Appellant, v. Casey KRUL, Respondent.

Reported below, 90 A.D.3d 1378, 934 N.Y.S.2d 729.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution ( see Cuadrado v. New York City Tr. Auth., 65 A.D.3d 434, 884 N.Y.S.2d 35 [2009],lv. dismissed14 N.Y.3d 748, 898 N.Y.S.2d 80, 925 N.E.2d 83 [2010]).