Opinion
No. 119203.
July 17, 2002.
COA: 217148, Muskegon CC: 97-337072-CK
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the April 20, 2001, decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals and any further subsequent review by the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals' holding that plaintiff is covered under the mortgage clause of the insurance contract does not preclude defendant from arguing to the trial court on remand concerning the value, if any, of plaintiff's insured interest.