From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sindram v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 7, 2012
466 F. App'x 904 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-7075

03-07-2012

MICHAEL SINDRAM, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in no. 08-3676, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel.

JUDGMENT

KATHERINE A. HELM, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for claimant-appellant.

SCOTT D. AUSTIN, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. On the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Assistant Director, and NELSON R. RICHARDS, Trial Attorney. Of counsel on the brief were F. JOHN BRIZZI, Jr., Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and MICHELLE D. BERNSTEIN, Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Jan horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Sindram v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 7, 2012
466 F. App'x 904 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Sindram v. Shinseki

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SINDRAM, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 7, 2012

Citations

466 F. App'x 904 (Fed. Cir. 2012)