From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sindram v. Robelen

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 29, 2011
431 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-1093.

Submitted: April 19, 2011.

Decided: April 29, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD).

Michael Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Michael Sindram seeks to appeal the district court's order directing him to show cause why he should not be enjoined from filing further actions in that court and denying his motions for appointment of counsel and for a reasonable accommodation. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Sindram seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Sindram v. Robelen

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 29, 2011
431 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Sindram v. Robelen

Case Details

Full title:Michael SINDRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas B. ROBELEN, State Actor…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 29, 2011

Citations

431 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2011)