From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sinclair v. Otis Worldwide Corp.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 22, 2023
2:22-cv-02065-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 22, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02065-GMN-EJY

02-22-2023

BRODERICK SINCLAIR, individually, Plaintiff, v. OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION, OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, ROBERT LINDLEY, STEVE BERGER, ZACHARY CHRISTIANSEN, STEVEN SPERB, KEVIN HANSON, JANE NGUYEN, AND PAUL HENTZ; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants.

Doreen Spears Hartwell, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 7525 Laura Thalacker, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 5522 HARTWELL THALACKER, LTD Attorneys for Defendants OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY Doreen Spears Hartwell Hartwell Thalacker, LTD Attorneys for Defendant Otis Worldwide Corporation


Doreen Spears Hartwell, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 7525 Laura Thalacker, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 5522 HARTWELL THALACKER, LTD Attorneys for Defendants OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY

Doreen Spears Hartwell Hartwell Thalacker, LTD Attorneys for Defendant Otis Worldwide Corporation

DEFENDANT OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD (FIRST REQUEST)

HON. ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant Otis Worldwide Corporation (“Otis Worldwide”), by and through its attorneys, and pursuant to LR IA 6-1, respectfully moves this Court to extend the deadline for him to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint until March 6, 2023. In support of this motion, Otis Worldwide states as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed his Complaint in the District of Nevada on December 13, 2022.

2. Otis Worldwide was served on February 2, 2023, and its response is currently due on February 23, 2023.

3. Otis Worldwide and its counsel require additional time in which to investigate the claims and prepare his response to the Complaint.

4. Otis Worldwide's counsel contacted opposing counsel on February 21, 2023 to request an extension of time for Otis Worldwide to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff does not object to this extension.

5. This is Otis Worldwide's first request for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint.

6. This request is made in good faith and not for the purposes of unwarranted delay or for any other improper purpose.

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Otis Worldwide respectfully requests that the Court enter an order granting Otis Worldwide an extension of time until March 6, 2023, in which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sinclair v. Otis Worldwide Corp.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 22, 2023
2:22-cv-02065-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Sinclair v. Otis Worldwide Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BRODERICK SINCLAIR, individually, Plaintiff, v. OTIS WORLDWIDE…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 22, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02065-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 22, 2023)