Opinion
2:22-cv-02065-GMN-EJY
02-14-2023
BRODERICK SINCLAIR, individually, Plaintiff, v. OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION, OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, ROBERT LINDLEY, STEVE BERGER, ZACHARY CHRISTIANSEN, STEVEN SPERB, KEVIN HANSON, JANE NGUYEN, AND PAUL HENTZ; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants.
Doreen Spears Hartwell Hartwell Thalacker, LTD Attorneys for Defendant ZACHARY CHRISTIANSEN.
Doreen Spears Hartwell Hartwell Thalacker, LTD Attorneys for Defendant ZACHARY CHRISTIANSEN.
DEFENDANT ZACHARY CHRISTIANSEN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD (FIRST REQUEST)
ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
Defendant Zachary Christiansen (“Christiansen”), by and through his attorneys, and pursuant to LR IA 6-1, respectfully moves this Court to extend the deadline for him to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint until March 6, 2023. In support of this motion, Christiansen states as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed his Complaint in the District of Nevada on December 13, 2022.
2. Christiansen was served on January 25, 2023, and his response is currently due on February 15, 2023.
3. Christiansen and his counsel require additional time in which to investigate the claims and prepare his response to the Complaint.
4. Christiansen's counsel contacted opposing counsel on February 1, 2023 to request an extension of time for Christiansen to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff does not object to this extension.
5. This is Christiansen's first request for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint.
6. This request is made in good faith and not for the purposes of unwarranted delay or for any other improper purpose.
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Christiansen respectfully requests that the Court enter an order granting Christiansen an extension of time until March 6, 2023, in which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant Zachary Christiansen's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (ECF No. 42) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Zachary Christiansen's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (ECF No. 41) is DENIED as moot.