From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sinclair v. McNeil

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 26, 2011
Case No. SC10-2131 (Fla. Jan. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. SC10-2131.

January 26, 2011.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 2D10-3643, CRC04-07285CFANO.


Petitioner has filed a "Notice to Invoke All Writs Provision and/or Discretionary Jurisdiction," which this Court has treated as a petition for writ of mandamus. To the extent petitioner is seeking reinstatement of his petition in Case No. 2D10-3643, because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, the petition is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 2000). To the extent petitioner is seeking to collaterally attack his convictions and sentences, because the Court has determined that relief is not authorized, the petition is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sinclair v. McNeil

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 26, 2011
Case No. SC10-2131 (Fla. Jan. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Sinclair v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD L. SINCLAIR, Petitioner(s) v. WALTER A. MCNEIL, ETC., Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 26, 2011

Citations

Case No. SC10-2131 (Fla. Jan. 26, 2011)