From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sinclair v. Giove Law Office, P.C.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jul 22, 2005
Civil No. 05-3003-CO (D. Or. Jul. 22, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-3003-CO.

July 22, 2005


ORDER


Magistrate Judge John P. Cooney filed his Findings and Recommendation on June 29, 2005. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Cooney's Findings and Recommendation. Plaintiffs' case is dismissed for want of prosecution and judgment will be entered accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sinclair v. Giove Law Office, P.C.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jul 22, 2005
Civil No. 05-3003-CO (D. Or. Jul. 22, 2005)
Case details for

Sinclair v. Giove Law Office, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:DANNY AND JOANN SINCLAIR, Plaintiffs, v. GIOVE LAW OFFICE, P.C., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jul 22, 2005

Citations

Civil No. 05-3003-CO (D. Or. Jul. 22, 2005)