From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sinast v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Oct 23, 1985
698 S.W.2d 153 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 205-85.

October 23, 1985.

Appeal from County Court At Law, San Patricio County, J.M. Edmondson, Jr., J.

Petition for discretionary review from Thirteenth Court of Appeals, 13th Supreme Judicial District, 688 S.W.2d 631.

Joel B. Johnson, Sinton, for appellant.

Richard D. Hatch, Co. Atty. and Mary R. Collina, Asst. Co. Atty., Sinton, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.


OPINION ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


A jury convicted appellant of misdemeanor driving while intoxicated. The trial court assessed his punishment at 30 days confinement and a fine of $500. On appeal, the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and ordered that an acquittal be entered. Sinast v. State, 688 S.W.2d 631 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi). Finding that the Court of Appeals was correct in holding the evidence insufficient, we refuse the state's petition for discretionary review.

However, the Court of Appeals went further and held that under Texas law, prior to the 1984 amendments to Article 67011-5, V.A.C.S., a person's refusal to submit to a breath test was not admissible evidence in a trial for driving while intoxicated. Finding that this holding was unnecessary to the decision of the case, we neither approve nor disapprove this holding.

TEAGUE, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Sinast v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Oct 23, 1985
698 S.W.2d 153 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985)
Case details for

Sinast v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tony Paul SINAST, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Oct 23, 1985

Citations

698 S.W.2d 153 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985)