From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sinard v. Wortley

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Aug 5, 2021
No. A-1-CA-38528 (N.M. Ct. App. Aug. 5, 2021)

Opinion

A-1-CA-38528

08-05-2021

ANDY SHAUN SINARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. JAMIE LEIGH MCLANE WORTLEY, Respondent-Appellee.

Sanders, Bruin, Coll & Worley, P.A. Clayton S. Hightower Roswell, NM for Appellant Max Houston Proctor Hobbs, NM for Appellee


Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly in Odyssey.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY Jane Shuler Gray, District Judge

Sanders, Bruin, Coll & Worley, P.A.

Clayton S. Hightower

Roswell, NM

for Appellant

Max Houston Proctor

Hobbs, NM

for Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

{¶1} Summary reversal, in part, and affirmance in part, was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal, in part, and affirmance in part, has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{¶2} REVERSED, IN PART, AND AFFIRMED IN PART.

{¶3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

WE CONCUR: ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge, JANE B. YOHALEM, Judge


Summaries of

Sinard v. Wortley

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Aug 5, 2021
No. A-1-CA-38528 (N.M. Ct. App. Aug. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Sinard v. Wortley

Case Details

Full title:ANDY SHAUN SINARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. JAMIE LEIGH MCLANE WORTLEY…

Court:Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Date published: Aug 5, 2021

Citations

No. A-1-CA-38528 (N.M. Ct. App. Aug. 5, 2021)