From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sinanan v. Cross

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 15, 2007
Civil 06-3807 PAM/FLN (D. Minn. Feb. 15, 2007)

Summary

denying § 2241 motion of Petitioner found guilty of and sanctioned for Code 221 because he met a female friend in car while he was “assigned to an outside work detail while imprisoned at FPC-Duluth”

Summary of this case from Broadfield v. Ma'at

Opinion

Civil 06-3807 PAM/FLN.

February 15, 2007


ORDER


Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated January 29, 2007, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [#1] is GRANTED IN PART and that Petitioner be provided with another DHO hearing that satisfies the requirements of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-71 (1974), including the provision that Petitioner be afforded an impartial disciplinary hearing.


Summaries of

Sinanan v. Cross

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 15, 2007
Civil 06-3807 PAM/FLN (D. Minn. Feb. 15, 2007)

denying § 2241 motion of Petitioner found guilty of and sanctioned for Code 221 because he met a female friend in car while he was “assigned to an outside work detail while imprisoned at FPC-Duluth”

Summary of this case from Broadfield v. Ma'at
Case details for

Sinanan v. Cross

Case Details

Full title:Richie Sinanan, Petitioner, v. James N. Cross, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 15, 2007

Citations

Civil 06-3807 PAM/FLN (D. Minn. Feb. 15, 2007)

Citing Cases

Broadfield v. Ma'at

As remarked above, although on furlough, he is still in BOP custody. See Dalke v. Terris, Case No.…