From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sims v. Wholers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2011
No. CIV S-09-2582 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2582 GGH P

09-26-2011

DARIUS SIMS, Plaintiff, v. ANN WHOLERS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On August 22, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel and a motion to compel production of documents. By application of the mailbox rule, it appears that these documents may have been filed, on August 12, 2011, the same day this case was dismissed. Nevertheless, this civil rights action was closed on August 12, 2011; therefore, plaintiff's filings do not appear to be ones contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure. These documents (docket # 41 and docket # 42) will be placed in the file and disregarded.

Pursuant to Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 275-76, 108 S. Ct. 2379, 2385 (1988)(pro se prisoner filing is dated from the date prisoner delivers it to prison authorities). Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103, 1109 (9th Cir. 2009), holding that "the Houston mailbox rule applies to § 1983 complaints filed by pro se prisoners").

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Sims v. Wholers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2011
No. CIV S-09-2582 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Sims v. Wholers

Case Details

Full title:DARIUS SIMS, Plaintiff, v. ANN WHOLERS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 26, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2582 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)