From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sims v. Tampa Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 16, 2018
CASE No.: 8:18-cv-2397-T-33SPF (M.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2018)

Opinion

CASE No.: 8:18-cv-2397-T-33SPF

11-16-2018

JEJUAN SIMS, Plaintiff, v. TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Sean P. Flynn, United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 6), filed October 29, 2018. Judge Flynn recommends Plaintiff Jejuan Sims's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 2) be denied and Sims's Complaint be dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend. Specifically, Judge Flynn recommends that Jejuan be authorized to file an Amended Complaint that sets forth a factual basis for the Court's jurisdiction and for his claims. No objections have been filed, and the time for the submission of objections has expired. Discussion

A district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation after a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations has been conducted. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). The district judge will review legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations, and giving de novo review to the matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 6) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. (2) Plaintiff Jejuan Sims's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 2) is DENIED. (3) Sims's Complaint (Doc. # 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. (4) Sims is authorized to file an Amended Complaint that corrects the issues identified in the Report and Recommendation by December 5, 2018, failing which the Court will dismiss and close the case.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 16th day of November, 2018.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sims v. Tampa Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 16, 2018
CASE No.: 8:18-cv-2397-T-33SPF (M.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Sims v. Tampa Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:JEJUAN SIMS, Plaintiff, v. TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 16, 2018

Citations

CASE No.: 8:18-cv-2397-T-33SPF (M.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2018)

Citing Cases

Welch v. Wright

Courts, however, have specifically held that 18 U.S.C. § 2261A is a federal criminal statute that does not…