From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sims v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 28, 2006
No. CIV S-05-0902 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0902 FCD GGH P.

February 28, 2006


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed October 27, 2005, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On November 23, 2005, plaintiff was granted a thirty day extension of time to file an amended complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Sims v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 28, 2006
No. CIV S-05-0902 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Sims v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE SIMS, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, Warden, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 28, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0902 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2006)