From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simpson v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 30, 2009
No. CIV S-09-3295 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3295 WBS DAD P.

December 30, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's December 21, 2009 motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 7) is denied.


Summaries of

Simpson v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 30, 2009
No. CIV S-09-3295 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Simpson v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD R. SIMPSON, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 30, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3295 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2009)