Messrs. Francis R. Stark and Nelson, Mullins Grier, for appellant, cite: As to validity of stipulation regardingfiling of claim: 65 S.C. 95; 43 S.E., 448; 71 S.C. 506; 51 S.E., 259; 83 S.C. 41; 64 S.E., 963; 77 S.C. 378; 58 S.E., 6; 104 S.C. 393; 89 S.E., 321; 147 S.C. 423; 145 S.E., 294; 149 S.C. 214; 146 S.E., 873; 5 S.C. 358; 1 Am. Rep., 387; 48 Am. Rep., 713; 11 L.R.A., 102; 30 L.R.A., 612; 45 Am. Rep., 491; 14 S.E., 94; 21 A.S.R., 166; 56 L.R.A., 747; 77 A.S.R., 70. Constructionof statutes: 180 S.C. 501; 186 S.E., 523; 59 C.J., 1011; 132 S.C. 427; 128 S.E., 865; 25 R.C.L., 1054. Messrs.
Action by P.O. Payne, by Proter Payne, Jr., by his guardian ad litem, P.O. Payne and by Carolyn Payne by her guardian ad litem, P.O. Payne, against the Atlantic Greyhound Bus Lines. From adverse judgments, defendant appeals. Messrs. Tobias Turner and Price Poag, for appellant, cite: Segregation of witnesses: 113 S.C. 64; 101 S.E., 41; 72 S.C. 162; 51 S.E., 553; 156 S.C. 63; 152 S.E., 825; 83 S.C. 46; 64 S.E., 1017. As to limitation ofliability of carrier: 103 S.C. 365; 88 S.E., 14; 10 C.J., 133; 91 S.C. 503; 74 S.E., 1071. Limitation of time tofile claim: 71 S.C. 506; 51 S.E., 259; 104 S.C. 393; 89 S.E., 721. Charge: 76 S.C. 49; 56 S.E., 657; 86 S.C. 285; 68 S.E., 680; 94 S.C. 324; 77 S.E., 1117; 84 S.C. 573; 66 S.E., 693; 83 S.C. 325; 65 S.E., 278. Punitivedamages: 111 S.C. 499; 98 S.E., 793; 65 S.C. 1; 43 S.E., 307; 64 S.C. 423; 42 S.E., 196; 72 S.C. 343; 51 S.E., 919. Messrs. J. Robt. Martin and J. Robt. Martin, Jr., for respondents, cite: Duty of carrier to passenger: 179 S.C. 149; 177 S.C. 97; 53 S.C. 210; 35 S.C. 493; 87 S.C. 123; 99 S.C. 251; 94 S.C. 286; 81 S.C. 1; 97 S.C. 465; 98 S.C. 99; 98 S.C. 338; 111 A.S.R., 848; 32 Am.Rep., 37; 111 S.W. 835; 5 L.R.A. (N.S.), 1013; 79 S.C. 154; 175 S.C. 9; 88 S.C. 14; 98 S.C. 89.
Action by E. McKay Miller against George Goodwin, Gus F. Wiles and others. From an order referring cause to the master, the defendants named appeal. Mr. Barnard B. Evans, for appellants, submits: ThatJudge Townsend was without jurisdiction to grant the orderappealed from: Code of 1912, vol. VII, sec. 3833; Code of 1912, vol. II, sec. 330; 25 S.C. 72; 97 S.C. 459; 98 S.C. 184; 24 Am. St. Rep. 366; 79 S.C. 557; 104 S.C. 393. Theorder deprived appellants of a mode of trial to which theywere entitled, and is, therefore, appealable: 49 S.C. 423. Question of jurisdiction may be raised at any time, even inthe Supreme Court: 79 S.C. 557. Mr. Hunter A. Gibbes, for plaintiff-respondent, cites: Asto the jurisdiction and power of a Circuit Judge at chambers: Code, vol. II, sec. 440, sec. 442; 55 S.C. 379; 68 S.C. 118.