From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simpson v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 26, 2017
217 So. 3d 229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. 3D17–668

04-26-2017

Mitchell SIMPSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Mitchell Simpson, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.


Mitchell Simpson, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, EMAS, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Mitchell Simpson ("the defendant") appeals the trial court's order denying his motion for postconviction relief, in which he alleged four grounds that cumulatively support his claim for ineffective assistance of trial counsel, requiring a new trial. As we conclude that the defendant's arguments are without merit and/or refuted by the record, and the defendant has failed to meet his burden under Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we affirm.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Simpson v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 26, 2017
217 So. 3d 229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Simpson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mitchell Simpson, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Apr 26, 2017

Citations

217 So. 3d 229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)