From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simpson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 21, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3947 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3947

02-21-2013

CHALMERS A. SIMPSON Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, et al. Respondents.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the Response thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey dated January 31, 2013, to which Petitioner has not filed any Objections, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. there is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

This Court finds that Magistrate Judge Hey's Recommendation that the Petition should be dismissed on the alternative grounds that (1) Petitioner did not comply with this Court's prior Order directing him to complete the in forma pauperis application, and (2) his claims that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole violated his due process rights when it failed to re-parole him are meritless, are fully supported by the law and the record presented.

BY THE COURT:

_____________

C. Darnell Jones, J.


Summaries of

Simpson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 21, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3947 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Simpson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Case Details

Full title:CHALMERS A. SIMPSON Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3947 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2013)