From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simpson v. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dec 6, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-2015 (D.D.C. Dec. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-2015

12-06-2013

David Ezell Simpson, Plaintiff, v. Bureau of Prisons, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff's pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, which requires the Court to screen and dismiss a prisoner's complaint upon a determination that it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Plaintiff is a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Butner, North Carolina. He claims that the U.S. Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") denied him due process by allegedly incarcerating him "for 36 months after full execution (detainer) supervised release violation on June 26, 2010." Compl. at 4. Plaintiff sues BOP under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for $300,000 in damages. However, "[i]t is . . . well settled that Bivens liability cannot be imposed on an agency of the Federal Government." Drake v. FAA, 291 F.3d 59, 72 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 475-79 (1994)). Hence, this action will be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

______________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Simpson v. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dec 6, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-2015 (D.D.C. Dec. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Simpson v. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:David Ezell Simpson, Plaintiff, v. Bureau of Prisons, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Dec 6, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-2015 (D.D.C. Dec. 6, 2013)