From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simpkins v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2017
Case No. EDCV 16-744-BRO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 16-744-BRO (LAL)

03-29-2017

AARON M. SIMPKINS, Petitioner, v. K. HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 29, 2017

By: /s/_________

Honorable Beverly R. O'Connell

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Simpkins v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2017
Case No. EDCV 16-744-BRO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Simpkins v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:AARON M. SIMPKINS, Petitioner, v. K. HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2017

Citations

Case No. EDCV 16-744-BRO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2017)