From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simpkins v. Dixon

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Nov 1, 2023
No. 1D2023-0965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 1, 2023)

Opinion

1D2023-0965

11-01-2023

Lawrence Simpkins, Petitioner, v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Lawrence Simpkins, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari-Original Jurisdiction.

Lawrence Simpkins, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Court treats the petition for writ of certiorari docketed April 20, 2023, as an appeal of the March 16, 2023, "Order Dismissing Petition for Writ of Mandamus," which was rendered April 6, 2023, upon the filing of the order denying rehearing. The Court treats the amended petition docketed May 9, 2023, as the initial brief. We summarily affirm for failure to show any basis for appellate relief. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

B. L THOMAS, RAY, and TANENBAUM, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

Simpkins v. Dixon

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Nov 1, 2023
No. 1D2023-0965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Simpkins v. Dixon

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence Simpkins, Petitioner, v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Department of…

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Nov 1, 2023

Citations

No. 1D2023-0965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 1, 2023)