Shufler v. Shufler, No. 73

Full title: JAMAL SHUFLER, Respondent Below-Appellant, v. JUDY SHUFLER, Petitioner…

Court: Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Mar 20, 2006

No. 73, 2006 (Del. Mar. 20, 2006)

Opinion

No. 73, 2006.

3-20-2006

JAMAL SHUFLER, Respondent Below-Appellant, v. JUDY SHUFLER, 1 Petitioner Below-Appellee.

Henry DuPont Ridgely

This 13^th day of March 2006, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The respondent-appellant, Jamal Shufler, has petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept an appeal from an interlocutory order of the Family Court, dated January 10, 2006, which addressed the procedure used for interviewing the parties' children.

(2) Respondent filed his application for certification to take an interlocutory appeal in the Family Court on January 30, 2006. The Family Court denied the certification application on March 1, 2006.

(3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court. In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within interlocutory appeal is REFUSED.

Under Supreme Court Rule 7(d) the names of the parties have been replaced with pseudonyms.