From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simons v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 15, 2010
397 F. App'x 923 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6988.

Submitted: September 30, 2010.

Decided: October 15, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00024-JBF-DEM).

Jimmy Eugene Simons, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Jimmy Eugene Simons seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. CockreU, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slaclc, 529 U.S. at 484-S5, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Simons has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Simons v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 15, 2010
397 F. App'x 923 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Simons v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:Jimmy Eugene SIMONS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 15, 2010

Citations

397 F. App'x 923 (4th Cir. 2010)