From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simms v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2008
2:06-cv-1722-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008)

Opinion

2:06-cv-1722-GEB-KJM-P.

February 22, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 21, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 21, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss is denied and respondent is directed to file an answer within sixty days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Simms v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2008
2:06-cv-1722-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Simms v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:STEFFON TERRELL SIMMS, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 22, 2008

Citations

2:06-cv-1722-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008)