From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simms v. Seaman

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 7, 2011
27 A.3d 373 (Conn. 2011)

Opinion

2011-09-7

Robert SIMMSv.Penny Q. SEAMAN et al.


John R. Williams, New Haven, in support of the petition.Raymond J. Plouffe, Jr., Shelton, Nadine M. Pare, Cheshire, Patrick M. Noonan and Matthew H. Geelan, Guilford, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 129 Conn.App. 651, 23 A.3d 1, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that claims of fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress brought against attorneys for conduct that occurred during judicial proceedings were barred as a matter of law by the doctrine of absolute immunity?”

NORCOTT and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Simms v. Seaman

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 7, 2011
27 A.3d 373 (Conn. 2011)
Case details for

Simms v. Seaman

Case Details

Full title:Robert SIMMSv.Penny Q. SEAMAN et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 7, 2011

Citations

27 A.3d 373 (Conn. 2011)
302 Conn. 915