From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simms v. Ferko

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jan 12, 2007
Case No. C06-5490RJB (W.D. Wash. Jan. 12, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. C06-5490RJB.

January 12, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. 5-1. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5-1), Plaintiff's Objections (Dkt. 9), and the entire record.

Plaintiff filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on August 25, 2006. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff made a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. The Clerk of the Court sent Plaintiff a letter notifying him of certain deficiencies in his in forma pauperis application. Dkt. 2. Plaintiff cured some of the defects, but still failed to provide the Court with a copy of his prison account statement for six months and copies of his Complaint for service. Judge Arnold issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending a denial of Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application. Dkt. 5-1. Judge Arnold also recommended requiring Plaintiff pay the Court filing fee and provide copies of his Complaint or face dismissal of this action without prejudice. Id. The Report and Recommendation was returned to the Court as undeliverable on October 23, 2006. Dkt. 6. Pursuant to Local Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(b)(2) dismissal without prejudice of this matter was noted for consideration on December 26, 2006. On December 27, 2006, Plaintiff filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, stating that he attempted to file a change of address with the Court. Dkt. 9. Plaintiff requested additional time to provide his prisoner's account statement for the last six months and copies of his Complaint for service. Id.

This Court granted Plaintiff an extension of time, and gave Plaintiff until February 2, 2007 to comply with the Court's directives. Dkt. 10. Judge Arnold's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5-1) was renoted for February 2, 2007. Dkt. 10.

This Court's Order (Dkt. 10) was sent to the address provided by Plaintiff (Dkt. 7) and was returned as undeliverable on January 16, 2007, because Plaintiff refused delivery (Dkt. 11). Plaintiff has failed to file any substantive objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff has been given adequate time to respond.

Therefore, it is hereby, ORDERED that:

• The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5-1).
• Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff has thirty days from entry of this order to pay the full $350.00 filing fee or this action will be dismissed without prejudice.
• The Clerk of the Court is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record, to any party appearing pro se at said party's last known address, and to the Honorable J. Kelley Arnold and note the thirty day due date on Judge Arnold's calendar for tracking.


Summaries of

Simms v. Ferko

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jan 12, 2007
Case No. C06-5490RJB (W.D. Wash. Jan. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Simms v. Ferko

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SIMMS, Plaintiff, v. MARK J. FERKO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Jan 12, 2007

Citations

Case No. C06-5490RJB (W.D. Wash. Jan. 12, 2007)