From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Stolin

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 and 13 Judicial Districts.
Aug 20, 2014
44 Misc. 3d 142 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)

Opinion

No. 2013–85KC.

2014-08-20

Clark J. SIMMONS, Respondent, v. Miriam STOLIN and Edwina Glasco, Appellants.


Present: PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Carol Ruth Feinman, J.), entered December 13, 2012. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $240.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, without costs, and the action is dismissed.

In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $250 for water damage to his car. The damage occurred while the car was parked in the garage of Kingsview Homes, Inc., a residential cooperative with which plaintiff had entered into a parking agreement to park his car in a designated parking spot. After a nonjury trial, the Civil Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $240.

Upon a review of the record, we find that defendants cannot be held liable for plaintiff's alleged damages. Defendants Edwina Glasco, the president of the co-op's board, and Miriam Stolin, the managing agent of the co-op, were acting on behalf of a disclosed principal, and thus, are not personally liable for any alleged breach of contract committed by their principal ( see Weinreb v. Stinchfield, 19 AD3d 482 [2005] ). Furthermore, the record does not establish that defendants had committed any tortious acts. Since plaintiff failed to allege a basis upon which to hold defendants personally liable, the action should have been dismissed ( see Ruti v. Knapp, 193 A.D.2d 662, 663 [1993] ). Consequently, the judgment failed to provide the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law ( see CCA 1804, 1807; Ross v. Friedman, 269 A.D.2d 584 [2000]; Williams v. Roper, 269 A.D.2d 125, 126 [2000] ).

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the action is dismissed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Simmons v. Stolin

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 and 13 Judicial Districts.
Aug 20, 2014
44 Misc. 3d 142 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)
Case details for

Simmons v. Stolin

Case Details

Full title:Clark J. SIMMONS, Respondent, v. Miriam STOLIN and Edwina Glasco…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 and 13 Judicial Districts.

Date published: Aug 20, 2014

Citations

44 Misc. 3d 142 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 51319
998 N.Y.S.2d 308