From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. O'Brien

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 27, 2008
267 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-7638.

Submitted: February 21, 2008.

Decided: February 27, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Riser, Senior District Judge. (7:07-cv-00193-jlk).

Vincent L. Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILRINS, Senior Circuit Judge.


Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Vincent L. Simmons, a District of Columbia prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Simmons has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Because Simmons was convicted in a District of Columbia court, he is required to obtain a certificate of appealability in order to appeal the denial of his § 2241 petition. See Madley v. United Stales Parole Comm'n, 278 F.3d 1306(D.C. Cir. 2002).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Simmons v. O'Brien

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 27, 2008
267 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Simmons v. O'Brien

Case Details

Full title:Vincent L. SIMMONS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Terry O'BRIEN; United…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 2008

Citations

267 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Ziegler

The Fourth Circuit dismissed the petitioner's appeal via a per curiam opinion, finding that the petitioner…

Knight v. Bell

Lastly, the Court notes that in order to appeal this denial of his Petition under § 2241, Petitioner must…