From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Luther

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 6, 2015
Case 3:15-cv-135-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2015)

Opinion

Case 3:15-cv-135-KRG-KAP

10-06-2015

ERNEST SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. JAMEY LUTHER, SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. LAUREL HIGHLANDS, Respondent


Memorandum Report and Recommendation

Petitioner's motion styled "Simmons' Motion for Reconsideration Under Rule 59" at docket no. 5 has been referred to me under 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(3). It should be denied. The petitioner's major premise (¶1 of the motion) is false, his minor premise (¶2 of the motion) is irrelevant, and his conclusion (¶3 of the notion) is therefore erroneous. It appears that petitioner does not understand what the Court ruled.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1), the parties are given notice that they have fourteen days to serve and file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. DATE : 6 October 2015

/s/_________

Keith A. Pesto,

United States Magistrate Judge
Notice by ECF to counsel of record and by U.S. Mail to:

Ernest Simmons JY-9170

S.C.I. Laurel Highlands

P.O. Box 631

5706 Glades Pike

Somerset, PA 15501-0631


Summaries of

Simmons v. Luther

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 6, 2015
Case 3:15-cv-135-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Simmons v. Luther

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. JAMEY LUTHER, SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. LAUREL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 6, 2015

Citations

Case 3:15-cv-135-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2015)