From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Luther

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 28, 2015
Case 3:15-cv-135-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 2015)

Opinion

Case 3:15-cv-135-KRG-KAP

10-28-2015

ERNEST SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. JAMEY LUTHER, SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. LAUREL HIGHLANDS, Respondent


Memorandum Order

Petitioner's Rule 59 motion, docket no. 5, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto under 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(3).

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on October 7, 2015, docket no. 6, recommending that the motion be denied.

The petitioner was notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1), he had fourteen days to file objections. Petitioner did not file objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired.

Upon review of the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 28th day of October, 2015, it is

ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration at docket no. 5 is denied.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice by ECT to counsel of record and by U.S. Mail to:

Ernest Simmons JY-9170
S.C.I. Laurel Highlands
P.O. Box 631
5706 Glades Pike
Somerset, PA 15501-0631


Summaries of

Simmons v. Luther

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 28, 2015
Case 3:15-cv-135-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Simmons v. Luther

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. JAMEY LUTHER, SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. LAUREL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 28, 2015

Citations

Case 3:15-cv-135-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 2015)