From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Grounds

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0184 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0184 GGH P.

February 23, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Kern County Superior Court. Kern County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis;

2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721

DATED: February 23, 2011


Summaries of

Simmons v. Grounds

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0184 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Simmons v. Grounds

Case Details

Full title:ERIC JUSTIN RENE SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. RANDY GROUNDS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 23, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0184 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2011)