From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Falk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 20, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02742-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02742-BNB

12-20-2012

LEO SIMMONS Applicant, v. JAMES FALK, Warden, and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Respondents.


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

On December 19, 2012, Applicant filed a pleading titled, "Default Judgments-Against Officer or Agency of State C.R.C.P. 55(e)," ECF No. 14. The Court construes the pleading as a Motion for Default Judgment. Applicant asserts Respondents have failed to file a Response as they were instructed to do by the Court. The Motion is DENIED as inappropriate and moot. Respondents filed a Preliminary Response on November 21, 2012.

Although Respondents have submitted a certificate of mailing to the Court indicating they sent a copy of the Preliminary Response to Applicant on November 23, 2012, and Applicant filed a Brief on November 26, 2012, it is not clear that Applicant has received a copy of the Preliminary Response. The Court, therefore, will instruct Respondents to resend a copy to Applicant. The Court will give Applicant an additional twenty-one days from the date Respondents file a certificate of mailing with the Court indicating they resent a copy of the Preliminary Response to Applicant to file a Reply.


Summaries of

Simmons v. Falk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 20, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02742-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Simmons v. Falk

Case Details

Full title:LEO SIMMONS Applicant, v. JAMES FALK, Warden, and JOHN SUTHERS, The…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02742-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 20, 2012)