Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Simmons v. Dept. of Transp

225 Ga. App. 572 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Simmons v. Dept. of Transp

3 Citing cases

  1. Stuttering Foundation, Inc. v. Glynn County

    301 Ga. 492 (Ga. 2017)

    Having disposed of the case as moot, the Court did not address or consider whether *495 the appellant had actually held an interest in the property that would confer standing to challenge the zoning ordinance. See also Simmons v. Dept. of Transp., 225 Ga. App. 572 , 577-578 (484 SE2d 332 ) (1997) (Andrews, J., dissenting), in which the Sneakers case was characterized as one in which the property owner lacked standing to contest a zoning decision because it had been dispossessed of the property. 8

  2. Action Sound, Inc. v. Dept. of Trans

    265 Ga. App. 616 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that instruction that misstated the law was reversible error

    Hill v. State, 259 Ga. 557, 558(3) (b) ( 385 S.E.2d 404) (1989).Simmons v. Dept. of Transp., 225 Ga. App. 572, 575-576 ( 484 S.E.2d 332) (1997). 221 Ga. 731, 739(2) ( 146 S.E.2d 884) (1966).

  3. Stuttering Found., Inc. v. Glynn Cnty.

    801 S.E.2d 793 (Ga. 2017)   Cited 11 times
    Noting that "the value of a tenant's contract right under a lease to possess and use the condemned property may constitute an additional aspect of the taking over and above the property rights taken from the fee simple owner"

    Having disposed of the case as moot, the Court did not address or consider whether the appellant had actually held an interest in the property that would confer standing to challenge the zoning ordinance. See also Simmons v. Dept. of Transportation, 225 Ga. App. 572, 577-578, 484 S.E.2d 332 (1997) (Andrews, J., dissenting), in which the Sneakers case was characterized as one in which the property owner lacked standing to contest a zoning decision because it had been dispossessed of the property. (i) The Foundation's lease expressly states: "This Lease shall create the relationship of Landlord and Tenant between the parties hereto; no estate shall pass out of Landlord and this Lease shall create a usufruct only."