From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Cates

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 20, 2023
1:23-cv-0793 JLT EPG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-0793 JLT EPG

08-20-2023

MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN CATES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE

(DOC. 8)

Previously this Court determined that Plaintiff is subject to the three-strikes bar imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and the allegations in the complaint-which concern the infringement of intellectual property rights-did not satisfy the “imminent danger of serious physical injury” exception to § 1915(g). (Doc. 6.)

On June 27, 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full within 30 days. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff was also informed the “failure to pay the required filing fee as ordered will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.” (Id. at 2, emphasis in original.) Despite this warning, Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee, and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, the action cannot proceed before the Court at this time.

Based upon the foregoing, the Court ORDERS:

1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee.

2. Plaintiff's motion to consolidate (Doc. 9) is terminated as MOOT.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Simmons v. Cates

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 20, 2023
1:23-cv-0793 JLT EPG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Simmons v. Cates

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN CATES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 20, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-0793 JLT EPG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2023)