From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Apple Bank

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 23, 1997
172 Misc. 2d 373 (N.Y. App. Term 1997)

Opinion

January 23, 1997

APPEAL from an order of the Nassau County District Court (Michael S. Alonge, J.), entered March 22, 1996, which denied a motion by defendant to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (5).

Timothy P. Brennan, New York City, for appellant.


MEMORANDUM.

Appeal dismissed.

The denial of a motion to dismiss a small claims action does not constitute the denial of substantial justice within the meaning of UDCA 1807 since the only effect of same is to require the parties to proceed to trial ( McBrearty v Pryor Mandelup, NYLJ, Apr. 23, 1992, at 28, col 1 [App Term, 9th 10th Jud Dists]; Chaloupka v Nassau Travel Ctr., NYLJ, Feb. 1, 1980, at 13, col 5 [App Term, 9th 10th Jud Dists]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

DIPAOLA, P.J., STARK and INGRASSIA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Simmons v. Apple Bank

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 23, 1997
172 Misc. 2d 373 (N.Y. App. Term 1997)
Case details for

Simmons v. Apple Bank

Case Details

Full title:PRINCESS SIMMONS, Respondent, v. APPLE BANK FOR SAVINGS, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1997

Citations

172 Misc. 2d 373 (N.Y. App. Term 1997)
660 N.Y.S.2d 603

Citing Cases

Walsh v. Vishnick

PRESENT: RUDOLPH, P.J., McCABE and TANENBAUM, JJ The denial of a motion to dismiss a small claims action does…

Kaloedas v. Citibank

In this small claims action, defendant appeals from an order of the City Court of Yonkers which denied its…