From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simenstad v. Spencer

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 19, 2012
NO. 02-11-00491-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-11-00491-CV

01-19-2012

NANCY SIMENSTAD APPELLANT v. R. KEITH SPENCER AND BAILEY & GALYEN APPELLEES


FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant's "Motion To Dismiss." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Simenstad v. Spencer

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 19, 2012
NO. 02-11-00491-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Simenstad v. Spencer

Case Details

Full title:NANCY SIMENSTAD APPELLANT v. R. KEITH SPENCER AND BAILEY & GALYEN APPELLEES

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-11-00491-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 19, 2012)