From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silverstein v. Keane

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 13, 1954
35 N.J. Super. 303 (App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

Argued September 27, 1954 —

Decided October 13, 1954.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants ( Mr. Seymour Margulies, on the brief; Mr. Sol Schulman, attorney).

Mr. Abraham J. Slurzberg argued the cause for defendant-respondent in companion case of Silverstein v. Dohoney, A-534/53. Mr. Irving I. Vogelman argued the cause for defendants-respondents; attorney for defendants-respondents Charles Rovegno and Frank Palmieri ( Mr. Francis P. Morley, attorney for defendant-respondent, Patrick Keane; Messrs. Gottlieb Gottlieb, attorneys for defendants-respondents, Frankie Nelson and Anthony Palmieri).


The argument on appeal of this case was consolidated by suggestion of counsel and with the approval of this court since many common questions of law and fact arising out of similar contracts were involved.

The issues and their determinations are fully set forth in the opinion filed under the companion case of Silverstein v. Dohoney, A-534/53 filed simultaneously herewith. 32 N.J. Super. 357 ( App. Div. 1954). The opinion comprehends this appeal.

Judgment is reversed, costs to abide the result of the retrial.


Summaries of

Silverstein v. Keane

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 13, 1954
35 N.J. Super. 303 (App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Silverstein v. Keane

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN SILVERSTEIN AND JULIAN SILVERSTEIN T/A SILCO CIGARETTE SERVICE…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 13, 1954

Citations

35 N.J. Super. 303 (App. Div. 1954)
114 A.2d 307

Citing Cases

Silverstein v. Keane

The plaintiffs' appeals were consolidated for argument in the Superior Court, Appellate Division, which…

Silverstein v. Abco Vending Service, Inc.

It was argued below that the delay in bringing the present action and the election by plaintiffs to terminate…