From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silverman v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 1991
171 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

March 5, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.).


Attorney Leonard L. Steinman was retained by the plaintiff sometime in 1986 to prosecute a personal injury action against the City of New York. In response to plaintiff's motion to discharge Steinman, Steinman cross-moved for leave to withdraw as plaintiff's attorney and for an order sealing the record. In support of his cross-motion, Steinman included as exhibits correspondence between himself, plaintiff and this Department's Disciplinary Committee concerning a complaint filed by the plaintiff relating to this action.

Judiciary Law § 90 (10) provides for the confidentiality of disciplinary proceedings, and the court's order sealing the record as to those papers and documents which constituted records of, or correspondence with the disciplinary committee, was proper. The order appealed from, however, was overly broad, as the remaining documents and papers which were submitted on the motion and cross-motion, are not protected by confidentiality. We modify accordingly.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Silverman v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 1991
171 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Silverman v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT B.L. SILVERMAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant. HERBERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1991

Citations

171 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
566 N.Y.S.2d 640

Citing Cases

FINN v. DUNSTON

This statute provides for the confidentiality of all records and documents relating to attorney disciplinary…