From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silva v. Vizcarrondo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 13, 2006
31 A.D.3d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8284.

July 13, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered September 26, 2005, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, the complaint reinstated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Catterson and Malone, JJ.


The affirmation of plaintiff's treating physician, based upon six physical examinations of plaintiff over the course of 17 months beginning shortly after the accident, included her findings of limited ranges of motion in the lumbar and cervical spine and right elbow, which she assigned specific percentages and compared to the normal range. Contrary to the motion court's conclusion, this met the minimal standard required to substantiate a claim of "serious injury" pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d).


Summaries of

Silva v. Vizcarrondo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 13, 2006
31 A.D.3d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Silva v. Vizcarrondo

Case Details

Full title:CARMEN SILVA, Appellant, v. RAFAEL VIZCARRONDO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 13, 2006

Citations

31 A.D.3d 292 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5726
819 N.Y.S.2d 246

Citing Cases

Whisenant v. Farazi

Dr. Wright's initial examination occurred only two months after the subject accident and his June 12, 2008…

Smith v. Quick Tr., Inc.

Plaintiff's submissions in opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment were sufficient to raise an…