From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silva v. Silva

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Feb 13, 2019
273 So. 3d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 3D17-2008

02-13-2019

Alberto SILVA, Appellant, v. Mary H. SILVA, et al., Appellees.

Andrew M. Kassier, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein (Tallahassee), Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee, Department of Revenue.


Andrew M. Kassier, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein (Tallahassee), Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee, Department of Revenue.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On the record before us, we conclude that the trial court did not commit reversible error when it denied the Former Husband's Motion to Vacate. There was no basis upon which to impute income to the mother, see § 61.30, Fla. Stat., and the Department of Revenue established a substantial change in circumstances requiring an increase in the father's child support obligation, see § 61.14, Fla. Stat.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Silva v. Silva

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Feb 13, 2019
273 So. 3d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Silva v. Silva

Case Details

Full title:Alberto Silva, Appellant, v. Mary H. Silva, et al., Appellees.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Feb 13, 2019

Citations

273 So. 3d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)