From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silva v. Higgins

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Jan 26, 2006
C.A. No. 04-361S (D.R.I. Jan. 26, 2006)

Opinion

C.A. No. 04-361S.

January 26, 2006


ORDER


This Court received the Report and Recommendation ("RR") of United States Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond, filed on November 29, 2005, in the above-captioned matter. Plaintiff filed an Objection to the RR. Defendant City of Pawtucket filed a Response in Opposition. Review of the RR is de novo. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

Plaintiff's Objection asserts that Judge Almond misstated facts, is "once again involved in an attempted cover-up[,]" and erred by not allowing him to amend his complaint. The City of Pawtucket urges affirmance of the RR, describing it as "well-reasoned and correct."

After reviewing the parties' filings and the RR, this Court finds the analysis in the RR fully supported by the factual record and applicable law. This Court accepts and adopts the findings in Judge Almond's RR, issued on November 29, 2005. The objections raised by Plaintiff are without merit; therefore, Plaintiff's Objection to the RR is DENIED.

Accordingly, the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, Document Nos. 43, 44, 50 and 51, are GRANTED. Plaintiff's pending Motions, Document Nos. 30, 32, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 52, 55, and 56, are DENIED as moot. Silva's Amended Petition, therefore, is DISMISSED in its entirety. Final Judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants.


Summaries of

Silva v. Higgins

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Jan 26, 2006
C.A. No. 04-361S (D.R.I. Jan. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Silva v. Higgins

Case Details

Full title:JAMES J. SILVA, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE MICHAEL HIGGINS, CITY OF PAWTUCKET…

Court:United States District Court, D. Rhode Island

Date published: Jan 26, 2006

Citations

C.A. No. 04-361S (D.R.I. Jan. 26, 2006)