Opinion
No. 04-74676.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed May 2, 2008.
Lorenzo Tijerina, for Petitioner.
CAS-District Counsel, San Diego, CA, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Ronald E. Lefevre, San Francisco, CA, Lyle D. Jentzer, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A78-535-532.
Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Cristian Manuel Silva-Porto, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order summarily affirming an immigration judge's order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review Silva-Porto's contention he was not informed of his apparent eligibility to file for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1154(a)(1)(B)(ii)(I) because he did not exhaust this argument before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (holding that the court lacks jurisdiction to review issues not raised during administrative proceedings).