From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siluk v. Merwin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Apr 28, 2015
No. 11-3996 (3d Cir. Apr. 28, 2015)

Opinion

No. 11-3996

04-28-2015

MICHAEL E. SILUK, JR., Appellant v. CATHERINE MERWIN, Director of Perry County Domestic Relations Section


PRECEDENTIAL

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(Civil Action No. 1-11-cv-01654)
District Judge: Honorable Judge Christopher C. Conner
Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge and CHAGARES, GARTH, Circuit Judges ORDER AMENDING OPINION

At the direction of the Court, the opinion filed April 10, 2015 is hereby amended to reflect the appeal fee applicable at the time Appellant filed his notice of appeal. Page 3, paragraph 2: He currently owes a filing fee to both courts ($350 to the Clerk of the District Court and $455 to the Clerk of this Court which was the applicable appeal fee at the time the notice of appeal was filed). and Page 9, paragraph 1: In this case, Siluk faces the prospect of paying two fees: (1) the $350 district court filing fee that he incurred by filing his pro se complaint; and (2) the $455 fee he incurred in this court for pursuing an appeal of the district court judgment. For the Court, /s/
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Date: April 28, 2015


Summaries of

Siluk v. Merwin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Apr 28, 2015
No. 11-3996 (3d Cir. Apr. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Siluk v. Merwin

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL E. SILUK, JR., Appellant v. CATHERINE MERWIN, Director of Perry…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 28, 2015

Citations

No. 11-3996 (3d Cir. Apr. 28, 2015)