From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sille v. Parball Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 5, 2011
CASE NO.: 2:07-CV-00901-KJD-LRL (D. Nev. Aug. 5, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2:07-CV-00901-KJD-LRL

08-05-2011

GRO ELISABET SILLE, Plaintiff, v. PARBALL CORPORATION, d/b/a THE FLAMINGO LAS VEGAS AND PARBALL CORPORATION, d/b/a THE FLAMINGO HILTON HOTEL AND CASINO, DOES I through XX, and ROE CORPORATIONS I through XX, Defendants.

J. William Ebert, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 2697 Las Vegas, NV 89144 Counsel for Defendant Kevin M. Hanratty, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7734 Las Vegas, NV 89106 Counsel for Plaintiff Stephen D, Chakwin, Jr., Esq. New York Bar No. 1422500 New York, New York 10005 Counsel for Plaintiff J. WILLIAM EBERT Nevada Bar No. 2697 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Attorney for Defendant


J. WILLIAM EBERT

Nevada Bar No. 2697

SMITH, CURRIE & HANCOCK LLP

1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 250

Las Vegas, Nevada 89144

Counsel for Defendant, Parball Corporation dba

Flamingo Las Vegas

JOINT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SUBMIT SETTLEMENT DOCUMENTS

(FIRST REQUEST FOR ADDITONAL TIME TO SUBMIT SETTLMENT DOCUMENTS)

IT IS HEREBY JOINTLY REQUESTED by Defendants PARBALL CORPORATION, d/b/a THE FLAMINGO LAS VEGAS AND PARBALL CORPORATION d/b/a THE FLAMINGO HILTON HOTEL AND CASINO, (incorrectly named in the caption herein as PARBALL CORPORATION, d/b/a THE FLAMINGO LAS VEGAS AND PARBALL CORPORATION, d/b/a THE FLAMINGO HILTON HOTEL AND CASINO), and Plaintiff, GRO ELISABET SILLE by and through their respective attorneys of record, that the Court extend the time for the parties to submit settlement documents, including but not limited to a Stipulation to dismiss this matter in conformance with the settlement reached herein.

The Stipulation for dismissal is presently due on Wednesday, August 3, 2011. This is the first request for additional time to submit settlement documents.

The reason for delay in submitting the Stipulation for dismissal is that a number of liens have been asserted on the settlement proceeds, including an attorney's lien filed last week. Because of the outstanding claimed liens, Plaintiff's counsel is preparing a request to implead the settlement funds into the Court in order so that the Court can determine the distribution of the settlement funds, Parball has likewise been considering such an interpleader.

In addition, such an interpleader will require appropriate provisions to protect the confidentiality of the parties' settlement agreement.

Based on the above, the parties request that the Court allow until August 17, 2011 for the filing of an appropriate request to implead the settlement funds and serve notice on the lien claimants.

DATED this 1st day of August, 2011.

SMITH, CURR1E & HANCOCK LLP

J. William Ebert, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 2697

Las Vegas, NV 89144

Counsel for Defendant

HANRATTY LAW GROUP

Kevin M. Hanratty, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 7734

Las Vegas, NV 89106

Counsel for Plaintiff

STEPHEN D. CHAKWIN, JR.

Stephen D, Chakwin, Jr., Esq.

New York Bar No. 1422500

New York, New York 10005

Counsel for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED:

________________

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Submitted by:

SMITH, CURRIE & HANCOCK LLP

J. WILLIAM EBERT

Nevada Bar No. 2697

Las Vegas, Nevada 89144

Attorney for Defendant


Summaries of

Sille v. Parball Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 5, 2011
CASE NO.: 2:07-CV-00901-KJD-LRL (D. Nev. Aug. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Sille v. Parball Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GRO ELISABET SILLE, Plaintiff, v. PARBALL CORPORATION, d/b/a THE FLAMINGO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 5, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 2:07-CV-00901-KJD-LRL (D. Nev. Aug. 5, 2011)