Opinion
July, 1935.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ.
Action to recover damages for malicious prosecution. Judgment for plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Silkworth v. Curtis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1935
245 App. Div. 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Summaries of
Silkworth v. Curtis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1935
245 App. Div. 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for
Silkworth v. Curtis
Case Details
Full title:WILLIAM S. SILKWORTH, Respondent, v. JAMES F. CURTIS, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jul 1, 1935
Citations
245 App. Div. 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)