From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silberman v. National Egg Product Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 14, 1944
39 A.2d 94 (N.J. 1944)

Opinion

Argued May 16, 1944 —

Decided September 14, 1944.

On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at 131 N.J.L. 286.

For the appellant, Frank P. Zimmer.

For the petitioner-respondent, David Roskein and Harry Cohn.

For the respondent Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company, Foley Francis.


This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court in a workman's compensation case.

We conclude that the case presents a question of fact, and there being testimony to support the finding of the Supreme Court, this court will not weigh the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Heher for the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Silberman v. National Egg Product Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 14, 1944
39 A.2d 94 (N.J. 1944)
Case details for

Silberman v. National Egg Product Co.

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS SILBERMAN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. NATIONAL EGG PRODUCT CO.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 14, 1944

Citations

39 A.2d 94 (N.J. 1944)
39 A.2d 94

Citing Cases

Quinn v. Automatic Sprinkler Co.

We find only one case in which a holding somewhat similar to the instant one was made. In Silberman v.…

Bucuk v. Edward A. Zusi Brass Foundry

R.S. 34:15-32; and see Sutkowski v. Mutual Chemical Co., supra. Where there are successive accidental…