From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silberberg v. M. Ascher Silk Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1924
208 App. Div. 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Opinion

February, 1924.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Smith, Merrell, Finch and Martin, JJ.; Clarke, P.J., and Merrell, J. dissent.


Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


The verdict, in my opinion, was clearly against the weight of the evidence. Furthermore, plaintiff having sued for $25,000, and the court having charged at the request of plaintiff's counsel that if the jury believed the plaintiff's story and plaintiff's witnesses they might find a verdict for the plaintiff for $6,615, besides interest, and the jury having returned a verdict for $2,500, there is no basis in the evidence for such a finding, and it was evidently a compromise verdict. I, therefore, dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial.


Summaries of

Silberberg v. M. Ascher Silk Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1924
208 App. Div. 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Case details for

Silberberg v. M. Ascher Silk Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SILBERBERG, Trading under the Firm Name and Style of EMPIRE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1924

Citations

208 App. Div. 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)